“ The problem before the High Courtroom was whether or not the franchise settlement is
null and void ab initio by cause of illegality for
failure to register the franchise prior to creating a suggestion to promote the franchixe and for failure
to sulply disclosure paperwork to the plaintiff. The expiration of the franchise agreement
was a motive for termination as offered beneath the franchise agreement, but
not for the refusal to renew. No termijation of the agreement apart
from good cause. 5. Overseas Growth - the presence of these franchises abroad
has prove that their buiness models work not soolely iin Malaysia alone but are adequate to bee transplanted elsewhere.
From the information, the franchise business was not
registered. The time period of the franchise was extened for another three year in 2003.
Subsequently, the defendant knowledgeable the plaintiff that both agreements which had expired on 21 January 2006 would
not be renewed. ”